Growth Regimes in a Structural Economic Dynamic Approach to the Neo-Kaleckian Model
Resumo
Following the insight that profits influence investment, providing not only the motive for it but also the means,we consider the natural rate of profit as one of the determinants of investment in a disaggregated version of the Neo-Kaleckian model of economic growth.By adopting this approach, it is shown that the structural economic dynamic is conditioned not only to the patterns of evolving demand and diffusion of technological progress but also to the distributive features of the economy, which can give rise to particular regimes of economic growth. From this perspective, it is possible to conclude that a wage-led regime is the most probable outcome in a closed economy where the natural rate of profit is one of determinants of investment.
Following the insight that profits influence investment, providing not only the motive for it but also the means,we consider the natural rate of profit as one of the determinants of investment in a disaggregated version of the Neo-Kaleckian model of economic growth.By adopting this approach, it is shown that the structural economic dynamic is conditioned not only to the patterns of evolving demand and diffusion of technological progress but also to the distributive features of the economy, which can give rise to particular regimes of economic growth. From this perspective, it is possible to conclude that a wage-led regime is the most probable outcome in a closed economy where the natural rate of profit is one of determinants of investment.
Downloads
Referências
Amadeo, E. 1986a. Notes on Capacity Utilization, Distribution and Accumulation. Contributions to Political Economy 5, 83 – 94.
Amadeo, E. 1986b. The Role of Capacity Utilization in Long Period Analysis. Political Economy 2, 147 – 160.
Araujo, R. and Teixeira, J. 2002. Structural Change and Decisions on Investment Allocation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 13(2), 249 – 258.
Araujo, R. and Teixeira, J. 2015. A Multi-Sectoral Version of the Post-Keynesian Growth Model. Estudos Econômicos 45(1), 127 – 152.
Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S. 1990. Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14 (4), 375– 93.
Blecker, R. 1989. International competition, income distribution and economic growth, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13, 395–412.
Blecker, R. 2002. Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models. In: Setterfield, M. (Ed.). The Economics of Demand-led Growth: Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, (UK) and Northampton (USA), 129 – 152.
Bortis, H. 2003. Keynes and the Classics – Notes on the Monetary Theory of Production. In: L.-P. Rochon and S. Rossi. (Eds.) Modern Theories of Money: The Nature and Role of Money in Capitalist Economies. Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar: 411 – 475.
Dumménil, G. and Lévy, D. 1999. Being Keynesian in the Short Term and Classical in the Long Term: The Tranverse to Classical Long-Term Equilibrium. The Manchester School 67(6), 684 – 716.
Dutt, A. 1984. Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power. Cambridge Journal of Economics 8, 25 – 40.
Dutt, A. 1990. Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dutt, A. 1997. Profit-Rate Equalization in the Kalecki-Steindl Model and the “Over-Determination” Problem. The Manchester School LXV(4), 443 – 451.
Ederer, S., Onaran, O. and Stockhammer, E. 2009. Functional income distribution and aggregate demand in the Euro-area. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(1), 139 – 159.
Ederer, S. and Stockhammer, E. 2007. Demand effects of the falling wage share in Austria. Empirica 35(5), 481 – 502.
Foley, D. and Michl, T. 1999. Growth and Distribution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
Hein, E. 2008. Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation. Contributions to Monetary Analysis. Palgrave MacMillan.
Hein, E. 2014. Distribution and Growth after Keynes: A Post-Keynesian Guide. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Massachusetts, USA.
Hein, E. and Vogel, L. 2008. Distribution and growth reconsidered – empirical results for six OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics 32(3), 479 – 511.
Kaldor, N. 1956. A model of economic growth. Economic Journal LXVII: 591-624.
Kalecki, M. 1971. Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, 1933–1970. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Lavoie, M. 1997. Pasinetti’s vertically hyper-integrated sectors and natural prices. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21, 453– 67.
Lavoie, M. 2003. Kaleckian Effective Demand and Sraffian Normal Prices: Towards a Reconciliation. Review of Political Economy 15(1), 53 – 74.
Lavoie, M. 2010. Surveying Short-Run and Long-Run Stability Issues with the Kaleckian Model of Growth. In: M. Setterfield (ed.). Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth. Edward Elgar. Chelteham (UK), and Northwampton, (USA), 132 – 156.
Naastepad, C. and Storm, S. 2006/7. OECD demand regimes (1960-2000). Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 29(2), 211 – 246.
Nell, E. 1989. The Rate of Profit in Kalecki’s Theory. In: Kalecki’s Relevance Today. Edited by Mario Sebatiani. Published by the Macmillan Press Ltd. London.
Park, M. 1995. A note on the Kalecki–Steindl steady-state approach to growth and distribution. Manchester School, 63 (3), 297–310.
Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth – A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of the Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasinetti, L. 1988. Growing sub-systems, vertically hyper-integrated sectors and the labour theory of value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12, 125 – 34.
Robinson, J., 1956. The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan
Robinson, J. 1962. Essays in the Theory of Economics Growth, London, Macmillan
Rowthorn, R. 1982. Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth, Studi Economici, no. 18.
Sasaki, H. 2012. Is the Long-run Equilibrium Wage-Led or Profit-Led? A Kaleckian Approach. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23, 231 – 244.
Sebastiani, M. 1989. Introduction: Kalecki’s Relevance Today. In: Kalecki’s Relevance Today. Edited by Mario Sebatiani. Published by the The Macmillan Press Ltd. London.
Scazzieri, R. 1990. Vertical Integration in Economic Theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 13(1), 20 – 46.
Smith, A. 1976 [1776], An Inquire into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Campbell R., Skinner, A. and Todd, W., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quaterly Journal of Economics 70, 65 – 94.
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Steedman, I. 1992. Questions for Kaleckians. Review of Political Economy 4, 125 – 151.
Steindl, J., 1952. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Taylor, L. 1990. Real and Money Wages, Output and Inflation in the Semi-Industrialized World. Economica, 57(227), 329 – 353.
Vianello, F. 1989. Effective Demand and the Rate of Profits: Some Thoughts on Marx, Kalecki and Sraffa. In: Kalecki’s Relevance Today. Edited by Mario Sebatiani. Published by the Macmillan Press Ltd. London.
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
