MMT na periferia:quais os limites ao policy space das economias emergentes?

quais os limites ao policy space das economias emergentes?

Palavras-chave: Modern Money Theory; emerging economies; policy space; international monetary and financial system.

Resumo

Esta nota toma como ponto de partida o artigo “As Falhas da Modern Money Theory (MMT)” - de autoria de Ricardo Carneiro e publicado neste número da BKR – para explorar as limitações da MMT na análise do policy space dos países periféricos que se inseriram na globalização financeira no início dos anos 1990, se convertendo em economias emergentes.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Daniela Magalhães Prates, Unicamp

Professora Associada do Instituto de Economia da Unicamp

Referências

Andrade, R. and D.M. Prates (2013), ‘Exchange rate dynamics in a peripheral monetary economy’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 35 (3), p. 399-416. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477350304

Bonizzi, B.; A. Kaltenbrunner. A.; J. Michell. (2019), Monetary sovereignty is a spectrum: Modern monetary theory and developing countries. Real-world economics review, p. 89, 46-61.

Borio C. and P. Disyatat (2015), ‘Capital flows and the current account: Taking financing (more) seriously’, BIS Working Paper 525.

Epstein, G. (2019), The institutional, empirical and policy limits of ‘modern money theory, PERI Working Papers Series n.481.

Gnos, C. and L. P. Rochon (2002), ‘Money creation and the state: A critical assessment of chartalism’, International Journal of Political Economy, 32 (3), p.41-57, doi: 10.1080/08911916.2002.11042881.

Keynes, J.M. (1930), The treatise on money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keynes, J.M. (1936 [1964]), The general theory of employment, interest, and money, reprinted 1964, London: Macmillan & Co Ltd.

Lavoie, M. (2013), ‘The monetary and fiscal nexus of neo-chartalism: a friendly critique’, Journal of Economic Issues, 47(1), p.1–32, doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624470101.

Lavoie, M. (2014), Foundations of post-keynesian economic analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

Minsky, H. (1986), Stabilizing an unstable economy, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mitchell, W; Wray, R. L.; Watts, M. (2019), Macroeconomics, UK: Red Globe Press.

Mundell, R. A. (1963), ‘Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates’, The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29(4), p.475-485.

Ocampo, J.A. (2001), International asymmetries and the design of the international financial system. CEPAL Serie Temas de Coyuntura n. 15. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

Paula, L. F. R., B. Fritz, B. and D. M. Prates (2017), ‘Keynes at the periphery: Currency hierarchy and challenges for economic policy in emerging economies’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(2), p.183–202, doi: 10.1080/01603477.2016.1252267.

Porcile, G. (2021), “Latin-American structuralism and neo-structuralism.” In: L. Alcorta, N. Foster-McGregor, B. Verspagen, A. Szirmai (editors), New perspectives on structural change: Causes and consequences of structural

change in the global economy, part 1, ch.3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prates, D. M. (2005), As assimetrias do sistema monetário e financeiro internacional. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, mai/ago, 9(2), p.263-288.

Prates, D. (2020), Beyond modern money theory: A Post-Keynesian approach to the currency hierarchy, monetary sovereignty, and policy space. Review of Keynesian Economics, 8(4), p.494-511, doi:10.4337/roke.2020.04.03

Prates, D. (2021), Monetary sovereignty in the post keynesian perspective: in the search of a concept, in Bonizzi, B., Kaltenbrunner, A. e Ramos, R.A. (eds).Emerging Economies and the Global Financial System Post-Keynesian Analysis, London: Routledge, cap. 16.

Prebisch, R. (1949), The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems, New York, United Nations Department of Economic Affairs.

Rey, H. (2013), ‘Dilemma not trilemma: The global financial cycle and monetary policy independence’, paper presented at the Jackson Hole Symposium.

Rochon, L.P. and M. Vernengo (2003), ‘State money and the real world: Or chartalism and its discontents’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26(1), p.57-68, doi: 10.1080/01603477.2003.11051383

Tcherneva, P. R. (2006), ‘Chartalism and the tax-driven approach’, In.: Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. A Handbook of alternative monetary economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 69-86.

Therneva, P.R. (2016), “Money, power, and monetary regimes.” Levy Economics Institute, Working Paper (861).

Vergnhanini, R. and B. M. De Conti (2017), ‘Modern Money Theory: a criticism from the periphery’, Brazilian Keynesian Review, 3(2), p.16-31, doi: 10.33834/bkr.v3i2.115

Vernengo, M. and E.P. Caldentey (2019), ‘Modern Money Theory (MMT) in the tropics: functional finance in developing countries,’ Working Paper 459, PERI Working Paper Series.

Wray, R. (1998), Understanding modern money: The key for full employment and price stability, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Wray, R. (2002), ‘State money’, International Journal of Political Economy, 32(3), p.23-40, doi: 10.1080/08911916.2002.11042877

Wray, R. (2015), Modern money theory: A primer on macroeconomics for sovereign monetary systems, 2nd edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Publicado
2021-12-07
Como Citar
Magalhães Prates, D. (2021). MMT na periferia:quais os limites ao policy space das economias emergentes? quais os limites ao policy space das economias emergentes?. Brazilian Keynesian Review, 7(1), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v7i1.254
Seção
Resenha