John Maynard Keynes Between Old and New Institutionalism
Abstract
The article considers the possible compatibility (in epistemological and ontological terms) of the conceptions of convention and institutions in the thought of John Maynard Keynes, Thorstein Veblen and Douglass North. We argue, first, that while Veblen suggests an approach to institutions based on instincts, North sustains an approach to institutions based on rational choice, which implies distinct conceptions about institutions and the social world. We then present Keynes's ontological commitments and the epistemological implications of his ontology. We conclude that there is a background ontological compatibility between Keynes and the late North in that both accept that the socioeconomic world is fundamentally uncertain and non-ergodic; also that Keynes is epistemologically closer to North than Veblen in studying the economy as a market system embedded in social institutions; and finally that Keynes's treatment of individual action is closer to Veblen’s than North’s, in that both Keynes and Veblen see human action as based on instincts and not only on rationality.
Downloads
References
Barnett, V. (2015), “Keynes and the psychology of economic behavior: From stout
and sully to the general theory”, History of Political Economy, 47(2), p. 307-
doi: 10.1215/00182702-2884345
Barnett, V. (2017a), “Veblen’s two types of instinct and the cognitive foundations of
evolutionary-institutional economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, 51(22),
p.541-562. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2017.1321453
Barnett, V. (2017b), “Keynes, animal spirits, and instinct: Reason plus intuition is
better than rational”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 39(3),
P.381-399. doi: 10.1017/S1053837216000274
Brady, M E. J. M. (2004), “Keynes’s theory of decision making, induction and
analogy: The role of interval valued probability in his approach”. New York:
XLibris.
Cardoso, F. G.; Lima, G. T. (2008), “A concepção de Keynes do sistema econômico
como um todo orgânico complexo”, Economia e Sociedade, 17(3), p. 359-381.
doi: 10.1590/S0104-06182008000300001
Coase, Ronald. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”. Economica, (November 1937), p.
-495.
Davis, J. B. J. M. (1997), “Keynes on history and conventions”. In: Harcourt, G.;
Riach, P., A second edition of the general theory. New York: Routledge.
Dequech, D. (2011), “Financial conventions in Keynes’s theory: The stock exchange”,
Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 33(3), p. 469-490. doi:
2753/PKE0160-3477330304
Desroches, C. T.; Rutherford, M. (2008), “The Institutional Reaction to Keynesian
Economics”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30(1), p.29-48. doi:
1017/S1042771608000033
Herscovici, A. (2012), “Informação, Conhecimento e Direitos de Propriedade
Intelectual: os limites dos mecanismos de mercado e das modalidades de
negociação privada”, Economia e Sociedade, 21(3), p.667-694. doi:
1590/S0104-06182012000300008
Hodgson, G. (1993), “Institutional economics: Surveying the ‘old’ and ‘new’.
Metronomica, 44(1), p.1-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.1993.tb00786.x
Keller, R. R. (1983) “Keynes and institutional economics: compatibility or
complementarity?” Journal of Economic Issues. XVII(4), December. doi:
1080/00213624.1983.11504189
Keynes, J.M. (2008 [1921]), “a treatise on probability”. New York: BN Publishing.
Keynes, J. M (1926). “Obituary of F. Y. Edgeworth”. Economic Journal. 36(141)
(March 1926), pp. 140-158.
Keynes, J.M. (1936), “The general theory of employment, interest and money”.
Available at
https://cas2.umkc.edu/economics/people/facultypages/kregel/courses/econ645/winter2011/generaltheory.pdf, Accessed on June 16th, 2019.
Keynes, J.M. “Letter to Roy Harrod, dated July, 4th, 1938”. Available at http://economia.unipv.it/harrod/edition/editionstuff/rfh.346.htm#23502, Accessed on June 16th, 2019.
Marshall, A. (1890), “Principles of economics: An introductory volume”. Available at https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/marshall/, Acessed on May 25th, 2020.
Mouhammed, A. D. (1999), “Veblen and Keynes”, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 13(2), p.169-186. doi: 10.1023/A:1022971927320
North, D. (1990), “Institutions, institutional change and economic performance”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. (1993), “What do we mean by rationality?”, Public Choice (1986-1998), 77(1), p.159-162. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3402-8_16
North, D. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
O’Donnell, R. (2019). Some misunderstood aspects of the final chapter of Keynes’s general theory. Review of Political Economy, 31(4), 509-527. doi: 10.1080/09538259.2020.1751473.
Peterson, W. C. (1977), “Institutionalism, Keynes and the real world”, Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 16(3), p.201-221. doi: 10.1080/00213624.1977.11503432
Polanyi, K. (1944[2000]), A grande transformação: as origens de nossa época. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Robbins, L. (1932), An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan & Co. Limited.
Rotheim, R. J. (1989), “Organicism and the role of the individual in Keynes’s thought”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 12(2), p.316-326. doi: 10.1080/01603477.1989.11489801
Runde, J. (1990), “Keynesian uncertainty and the weight of arguments”, Economics and Philosophy, 6(2), p.275-292. doi: 10.1017/S0266267100001255
Sembert, M. (1991), “Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise”, The Social Science Journal, 28(1), p. 1-14. doi: 10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
Setterfield, M. (1999), “Expectations, path dependence and effective demand: A macroeconomic model along Keynesian lines”, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 21(3), p.479-501. doi: 10.1080/01603477.1999.11490209.
Skidelski, R. (2005), John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946): Economist, philosopher, statesman. New York: Penguin Group.
Skidelski, R. (2010), John Maynard Keynes: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thabet, S. (2008), “Keynes and commons: Parallel stories, crossed destinies”, L’Economie Politique, 38(2), p.77-100. doi: 10.3917/leco.038.0077
Veblen, T. (1899), “The theory of the leisure class”. Available at http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/LCS/theoryleisureclass.pdf, Access on May 10th, 2019.
Whalen, C. J. (2012) “Post-Keynesian institutionalism after the great recession”. Working Paper 724 of the Levy Institute. Available at http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_724.pdf. Access on May 25th 2020.
Williamson, Oliver. (1985), “Transaction cost economics”. In: Williamson, Oliver. The economic institution of capitalism. London: The Free Press, p. 15-42.
Wray, L. R. (2007), “Veblen’s theory of business enterprise and Keynes’s monetary theory of production”, Journal of Economic Issues, 41(2). doi: 10.1080/00213624.2007.11507052
Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Miranda Cavalcante, Emmanoel de Oliveira Boff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors keep copyrights and concede to the Journal the right to the first publication, with the paper simultaneously licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which allows recognised author and journal work sharing.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive versions of the paper published in this journal (e.g.: publish in an instituional repository or as a book chapter) with the recogntion of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed (and are estimulated) to publish and distribute their work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or at their personal websites) at any point before or during the editorial process, once this may generate productive alterations on the paper, as well as increse the factor of impact and quotation of the published paper (please, see Free Access Effect)
